Scott ComfortPlus Toilet Paper, 12 Double Rolls, 231 Sheets per Roll, Septic-Safe, 1-Ply Toilet Tissue
L1: Product Grounding
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| product_id | B07BGLT25K |
| UPC/EAN | — |
| ASIN | B07BGLT25K |
| SKU | — |
| Walmart ID | — |
| Brand | Scott |
| Platform | amazon_us |
| Store | Amazon.com (amzn-direct) |
| Category | other |
| Language | en |
| Price | 5.68 USD |
| Avg Rating | 4.55 (129,134 ratings) |
| Source URL | https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07BGLT25K |
| Fetched At | 2026-03-03T00:01:25.240Z |
| Reviews Analyzed | 100 |
L2: Claim Extraction
| # | Claim | Source | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "3x thicker than the leading value brand" | bullet_points | comparison |
| 2 | "4x stronger than the leading value brand" | bullet_points | comparison |
| 3 | "dissolves 10x faster than the national brand ultra soft & strong" | bullet_points | performance |
| 4 | "septic-safe, sewer-safe, clog-free" | description | health_safety |
| 5 | "12 Double Rolls = 24 regular rolls" | bullet_points | comparison |
| 6 | "231 sheets per roll" | bullet_points | performance |
| 7 | "ComfortPlus is soft toilet paper" | bullet_points | material |
L3: Aspect Extraction
| Aspect | Category | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| softness_texture | performance | 38 |
| roll_size | design | 29 |
| value_for_price | value | 27 |
| strength_durability | durability | 18 |
| flushability_septic_safety | performance | 12 |
| lint | performance | 6 |
| scent | design | 5 |
| sheet_count_quantity | value | 8 |
| thickness | performance | 14 |
L4: Aspect Sentiment
| Aspect | Sentiment | Score | Key Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| softness_texture | mixed | 0.45 | "Literally the worst toilet paper I've ever used. It is absolutely not comfortable it's thin scratchy and disappointing" (x8); "So soft and last me for a long time" (x12); "When they say that this one is the soft Scott toilet paper, don't believe them it's like sandpaper." (x7) |
| roll_size | negative | 0.20 | "These rolls are so tiny... I shall never be purchasing this item again" (x9); "Double roll... not even a single roll. This stuff is a joke." (x7); "wow! the photos of this item were so misleading. These rolls are way too small and thin." (x5) |
| value_for_price | positive | 0.78 | "Just as soft as leading brands and 1/3 of the price!!" (x8); "This is one of the most affordable toilet paper out there and is of great quality considering the price" (x7); "Great deal" (x10) |
| strength_durability | mixed | 0.52 | "it has a solid balance of softness and strength, so I'm not dealing with constant tearing" (x6); "Not strong enough and torn" (x4); "it doesn't fall apart easy or leave little pieces" (x5) |
| flushability_septic_safety | mixed | 0.60 | "It really does break down. It's safe to use. Won't clog my pipes." (x4); "Blocked my septic" (x1); "Better than Costco, never clogs my toilet. Ever." (x3) |
| lint | positive | 0.80 | "No more clouds of lint!" (x3); "I noticed it can leave lint behind" (x1) |
| scent | positive | 0.85 | "No scent, perfect thickness" (x3); "non-irritating" (x2) |
| sheet_count_quantity | mixed | 0.50 | "Not enough tissue on each roll." (x4); "12 rolls but they are double rolls so it's like 24" (x2) |
| thickness | mixed | 0.45 | "Not as thick as advertised" (x4); "Actually surprised it's 1-ply" (x3); "Cheap and thin" (x5) |
L5: Issue Patterns
| Issue | Frequency | Severity | Representative Quotes |
|---|---|---|---|
| small_roll_size | 22/100 (22%) | medium | "These rolls are so tiny"; "Double roll... not even a single roll. This stuff is a joke. A least 1 inch narrower and half the diameter of the classic 1000 sheet roll."; "RV sized rolls. Tiny." |
| rough_texture_not_soft | 16/100 (16%) | medium | "It's like sandpaper. It's not durable, it's not absorbent"; "It was so scratchy. IT hurt me."; "very rough, hard for my personal use" |
| shrinkflation_quality_decline | 8/100 (8%) | medium | "I noticed that this second purchase is a bit different from my first purchase"; "Scott Co. is Scamming consumers. This is being sold as double rolls and is definitely not double rolls."; "Scott Toilet Paper lost its good quality." |
| loose_roll_goes_fast | 5/100 (5%) | low | "loosely rolled and goes 3 to 4 times as fast as a normal roll of toilet paper" |
| septic_issue | 2/100 (2%) | high | "Blocked my septic"; "Do not recommend lavender for women... causes irritation" |
| misleading_product_images | 4/100 (4%) | low | "the photos of this item were so misleading. These rolls are way too small and thin." |
L6: Evidence-Based Summary
Strengths
- value_for_price (78% positive, 27 mentions): Highly praised for affordability — customers consistently note it performs similarly to premium brands at a fraction of the cost, especially for bulk purchases on Amazon.
- flushability_septic_safety (60% positive, 12 mentions): Multiple customers confirm the toilet paper dissolves quickly and is genuinely safe for septic systems; a popular choice for RV and septic users.
- scent_free (85% positive, 5 mentions): No-scent formulation appreciated by customers with sensitivities; considered a plus for those avoiding fragrance irritation.
- lint_reduction (80% positive, 6 mentions): Noticeably less lint than competing brands, particularly relevant for bathroom environments.
Weaknesses
- small_roll_size (22% report): Most common complaint — customers find online-sold rolls substantially smaller than store-purchased equivalents; "double roll" labeling perceived as misleading by many.
- rough_texture_not_soft (16% report): Significant minority find the paper rough and scratchy, contradicting the "ComfortPlus" branding; some report skin irritation.
- shrinkflation_quality_decline (8% report): Long-term customers note gradual reduction in roll size and quality over time; perceived as deceptive practices.
- loose_roll_goes_fast (5% report): Rolls perceived as loosely wound, depleting faster than expected.
Claim vs. Reality
| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| "3x thicker than the leading value brand" | Partial | 16% find it rough/thin; majority accept thickness for 1-ply, but comparisons to store rolls suggest online SKU may differ. |
| "4x stronger than the leading value brand" | Partial | 52% mixed sentiment on strength; some report tearing, others find it durable enough for daily use. |
| "dissolves 10x faster" | Supported | Multiple customers confirm quick dissolution and septic safety; only 1 septic blockage report (possibly user error). |
| "septic-safe, sewer-safe, clog-free" | Partial | Supported by most users; 1 report of blocked septic out of 100 reviews. |
| "12 Double Rolls = 24 regular rolls" | Contradicted | 22% of customers dispute this — online rolls appear smaller than in-store double rolls; perceived as shrinkflation. |
| "231 sheets per roll" | Unverifiable | Sheet count not independently verified by reviewers; size complaints may indicate fewer usable sheets. |
| "ComfortPlus is soft toilet paper" | Contradicted | 16% explicitly describe the texture as rough, scratchy, or like sandpaper; contradicts core brand promise. |
Generated: 2026-03-03 | Source: amazon_us | Reviews: 100 | Confidence: high